Comments on: Rankings Reworked http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/07/02/rankings-reworked/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:43:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: snooky147 http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/07/02/rankings-reworked/#comment-3358 snooky147 Sun, 05 Jul 2009 08:35:26 +0000 http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9141#comment-3358 How is it positive to give the China event more points, yet leave the BEST attended tournament by far, with the exception of the WC and The Masters languishing at the bottom of the rankings. Once again the World Snooker Association shows it's total ineptness in all matters snooker. They have truly run this great sport into the ground and it's sad to watch. How is it positive to give the China event more points, yet leave the BEST attended tournament by far, with the exception of the WC and The Masters languishing at the bottom of the rankings. Once again the World Snooker Association shows it’s total ineptness in all matters snooker. They have truly run this great sport into the ground and it’s sad to watch.

]]> By: quintahunter http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/07/02/rankings-reworked/#comment-3357 quintahunter Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:56:28 +0000 http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9141#comment-3357 I agree with dannyboy. If next season (2010/11) we recover two ranking tournaments, will we change the rankings again? It seems World Snooker is trying to do many things lately, let's see if it's for the benefit of the game. On the other, I think it's positive to give more points to the Chinese events. They are the future, they have the money. I don't want the WC there, but it's the biggest snooker market right now and they must be rewarded. I agree with dannyboy. If next season (2010/11) we recover two ranking tournaments, will we change the rankings again? It seems World Snooker is trying to do many things lately, let’s see if it’s for the benefit of the game.

On the other, I think it’s positive to give more points to the Chinese events. They are the future, they have the money. I don’t want the WC there, but it’s the biggest snooker market right now and they must be rewarded.

]]> By: dannyboy http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/07/02/rankings-reworked/#comment-3356 dannyboy Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:37:37 +0000 http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9141#comment-3356 Im totally confused. Any points system has to be stuck with consistently for it to serve a legitimate purpose. Given the changes it is clear it will change again which makes the whole thing a total nightmare for the game. I am more and more convinced they are trying to make the game more popular overseas and get the stars to perform properly so to speak out there. Long term plan or desperation??? Im totally confused. Any points system has to be stuck with consistently for it to serve a legitimate purpose. Given the changes it is clear it will change again which makes the whole thing a total nightmare for the game. I am more and more convinced they are trying to make the game more popular overseas and get the stars to perform properly so to speak out there. Long term plan or desperation???

]]> By: Sammy@SnookerSceney http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/07/02/rankings-reworked/#comment-3355 Sammy@SnookerSceney Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:44:39 +0000 http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9141#comment-3355 Cool! Walden will be gutted. Cool!
Walden will be gutted.

]]> By: Anna http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/07/02/rankings-reworked/#comment-3354 Anna Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:45:38 +0000 http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9141#comment-3354 WOW! Thanks for the nice exercise for my brain :))))) WOW! Thanks for the nice exercise for my brain :) ))))

]]>