<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shanghai Masters Qualifiers 2009: Day Four Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt2745</title>
		<link>http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>matt2745</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9807#comment-685</guid>
		<description>The lowest ranked qualifiers usually have to play a wildcard round in the overseas events, has always been the case with the Shanghai Masters and China Open.

I&#039;ve heard nothing official on it yet but I would be surprised if that were to change this year, when I hear anything I will confirm it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lowest ranked qualifiers usually have to play a wildcard round in the overseas events, has always been the case with the Shanghai Masters and China Open.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard nothing official on it yet but I would be surprised if that were to change this year, when I hear anything I will confirm it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9807#comment-684</guid>
		<description>ah yeah sorry... i now see what you mean about the wild card round, well i spoke to m selt straight after his win against davis and he seemed sure he had john higgins...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah yeah sorry&#8230; i now see what you mean about the wild card round, well i spoke to m selt straight after his win against davis and he seemed sure he had john higgins&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9807#comment-683</guid>
		<description>i dont understand what you mean by this??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont understand what you mean by this??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddrIII</title>
		<link>http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>ddrIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9807#comment-682</guid>
		<description>If this year keeps 7 wildcards, those who need to play in the wildcard round will be Selt, Campbell, Higginson, Doherty, Greene, Bond and Dott.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this year keeps 7 wildcards, those who need to play in the wildcard round will be Selt, Campbell, Higginson, Doherty, Greene, Bond and Dott.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt2745</title>
		<link>http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>matt2745</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9807#comment-681</guid>
		<description>I like to see the legends do well but yeah I have to agree, it is nice to see younger players do well and make some progress. Really pleased for him, thought he had missed his chance in that decider at one point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to see the legends do well but yeah I have to agree, it is nice to see younger players do well and make some progress. Really pleased for him, thought he had missed his chance in that decider at one point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9807#comment-680</guid>
		<description>matt selt really deserves this win, and why do we wanna see davis back in the 16 anyway, the man has nothing to prove, id rather see young players like matt who are putting the hours in on the practise table progress to the venue s, nothing to do with a shabby performance..... id back matt to beat davis 7-8 times out of 10, cant wait to watch my good friend on tv!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>matt selt really deserves this win, and why do we wanna see davis back in the 16 anyway, the man has nothing to prove, id rather see young players like matt who are putting the hours in on the practise table progress to the venue s, nothing to do with a shabby performance&#8230;.. id back matt to beat davis 7-8 times out of 10, cant wait to watch my good friend on tv!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt2745</title>
		<link>http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>matt2745</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9807#comment-679</guid>
		<description>It was something that Janie Watkins mentioned somewhere else, apparently he has had a &quot;mysterious stomach problem&quot; and is awaiting an operation. She also said he has lost two stone which isn&#039;t great as he was pretty thin to start with. Hopefully he&#039;ll get that sorted out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was something that Janie Watkins mentioned somewhere else, apparently he has had a &#8220;mysterious stomach problem&#8221; and is awaiting an operation. She also said he has lost two stone which isn&#8217;t great as he was pretty thin to start with. Hopefully he&#8217;ll get that sorted out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nige</title>
		<link>http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Nige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9807#comment-678</guid>
		<description>We all know Davis doesn&#039;t like travelling too far these days, so there&#039;s no wonder he produced such a shabby performance against someone who has achieved very little to date. Its a shame as this result could have worked in his favour in his quest to return to the top 16.

Btw Matt, you mentioned that Ian Preece has &quot;bigger worries&quot; the other day - are these well documented or have I missed something??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know Davis doesn&#8217;t like travelling too far these days, so there&#8217;s no wonder he produced such a shabby performance against someone who has achieved very little to date. Its a shame as this result could have worked in his favour in his quest to return to the top 16.</p>
<p>Btw Matt, you mentioned that Ian Preece has &#8220;bigger worries&#8221; the other day &#8211; are these well documented or have I missed something??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9807#comment-677</guid>
		<description>go on the selt machine!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go on the selt machine!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt2745</title>
		<link>http://prosnookerblog.com/2009/08/06/shanghai-masters-qualifiers-2009-day-four-updates/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>matt2745</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosnookerblog.com/?p=9807#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Impressed with that from Greene, good player of course but he seemed to struggle in this round last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressed with that from Greene, good player of course but he seemed to struggle in this round last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

